Introduction
In a democratic country like Madagascar, freedom of expression becomes especially a struggle for those without political power. Yet speaking out, expressing what one feels, sees, and thinks is a fundamental right for everyone, without exception. This freedom is enshrined in Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Madagascar. But does this freedom of expression truly exist on the island? And how does it manifest itself?
Freedom of Expression: A Prerequisite for Democracy
Freedom of expression is essential for the proper functioning of democracy. Everyone is therefore free to share their opinions on political, social, economic, cultural, and other matters. Through this expression, governments can respond to the needs of the entire population. Citizens communicate what they observe and experience, especially their needs, through writing, media interventions, newspapers, social networks, participation in civil society, and whistleblowing. This allows them to seek opinions from local authorities or fight against abuses of power in public and private institutions. Thanks to technological advances, public expression has become easier. People are increasingly skilled at critiquing state policies in all areas. This means that the state is under constant public scrutiny. On one hand, this strengthens the connection between the governed and the governing. On the other hand, democracy can become vulnerable for various reasons.
Irresponsible Expression Weakens Democracy
Today, many African citizens express themselves hoping to be heard by their governments. However, few consider the responsibilities that come with freedom of expression. Too much freedom without accountability can endanger liberty itself. In this case, democracy faces a dilemma: accept unlimited expression or risk collapse because there is no balance between responsibility and freedom in democratic countries, including Madagascar. For instance, the Malagasy state struggles to control fake news, which can lead to social violence. Many assume they are free to speak without considering the negative impacts on public institutions. Development actors often fail to conduct thorough investigations into social phenomena. Therefore, while democracy is not dead, it cannot evolve without responsible citizen participation, trust between institutions and society, reliable information, and reasoned deliberation.
Conclusion
Freedom of expression is indeed one of the pillars of democracy. Yet much work remains to ensure that it truly supports democratic functioning. In Madagascar, as in other democratic countries, democracy is often superficial, and the same goes for freedom of expression. To achieve genuine freedom of expression, it is necessary to revise laws and public policies, and to ensure strong, fair, and consistent application of the rule of law.
Social Media: https://www.facebook.com/angela.tsima
