Introduction

In the three dimensions of politics (le, la, les), citizens often feel excluded because of needs that have never been sufficiently taken into account by Malagasy politicians. This article seeks to show that public policy and citizens have continued to move further apart, from the First to the Fourth Republic. Some citizens are becoming increasingly disengaged from political life, while some leaders may prioritize their personal interests over the public interest. Therefore, how can Madagascar overcome its various crises when some citizens are irresponsible and leaders do not sufficiently respond to collective needs?

Citizens and Public Policy

A citizen can be defined as a person over the age of eighteen who enjoys their rights and fulfils their responsibilities towards their nation, particularly by knowing their duties. Public policy, meanwhile, aims to address the different needs of the population in several sectors, while ensuring fair and inclusive treatment in order to contribute to sustainable development. It therefore cannot function without leaders responsible for its implementation or without citizens who are responsible towards their country. Thus, public policy and citizens are inseparable in building national development.

Unequal Treatment in Malagasy Politics

Examining the different forms of unequal treatment in the implementation of public policy helps to understand some of the reasons behind the country’s difficulties. In Madagascar, access to political power can be influenced by family ties and family networks. This logic can also be found in certain areas of the public service and in access to competitive examinations. For those who do not have such networks, access to positions of responsibility may appear more difficult. As a result, the principle of merit can be weakened. Furthermore, although women and men can participate in the political sphere, men remain more strongly represented. This situation can contribute to political disengagement and division among citizens.

Towards Better Malagasy Public Policy

The further public policy moves away from social realities and the more corruption gains ground, the more honest citizens may turn away from their country, while opportunists may present themselves as saviours. To address this situation, a change in culture is an important lever. It would be necessary, in particular, to strengthen an education system that responds to the needs of the population and is based on a political culture of meritocracy. Education is indeed a foundation of development. Citizens must also learn that politics should serve the population and not particular family interests.

Conclusion

To include citizens in a healthy and equitable public policy in Madagascar, everyone must be recognized according to their values and skills, without discrimination based on origin, ethnicity or religion. Citizens must also play their role by choosing representatives capable of overcoming discriminatory barriers, particularly religious, gender-based and ethnic barriers. Public policy could thus better respond to the needs of the population by promoting meritocracy and equality among Malagasy citizens.

Social Media: https://www.facebook.com/angela.tsima