Introduction

Ouagadougou, May 25, 2024 – The Ouagadougou National Assembly recently decided to grant a five-year extension to Burkina Faso’s political transition, led by Captain Ibrahim Traoré since September 2022. This transition period, initially scheduled to end on July 1 with the holding of elections, was extended following a national consensus aimed at avoiding a power vacuum.

A crucial meeting with the “forces vives

Participants at the meeting, representing various sectors of Burkinabe society, expressed broad support for the extension of Traoré’s term of office. Citizens’ movements, notably the citizens’ watch committees known as “wayiyans”, voiced their support for the decision. Bearing placards proclaiming “IB in power for life” and “10 years in power”, these groups made clear their distrust of traditional politicians and democracy, perceived as the sources of the country’s problems. The authorities’ determination to combat insecurity has also reinforced this confidence.

Power without safeguards

However, this extension has not met with unanimous approval. Critics point to the executive power’s lack of instruments for control and supervision. The absence of an active opposition, freedom of expression and an independent Transitional Legislative Assembly raises the question of the balance of power. The Korag, the body overseeing the transition, is perceived as being under the direct influence of the President, raising concerns about the possibility of an authoritarian drift.

Fervent but dangerous patriotism

The fervent patriotism observed among some supporters of the current regime could become an obstacle to constructive criticism. In this climate, any criticism is often perceived as unpatriotic or as serving foreign interests, which could poison the country’s social and political life.

The ever-present security challenge

The restoration of the national territory was clearly indicated by the Transition as its main focus for the 21 months it was to last. Despite efforts to strengthen the logistical and human capacities of the defense and security forces, the security issue remains a major preoccupation. The silence imposed on the press on the losses and failures of military operations limits transparency and the possibility of an objective assessment of the progress made. An impartial assessment during the conference would have enabled us to take a critical look at the methods used, and to propose new perspectives.

Conclusion

The decision to extend the transition reinforces the authority of the Executive, a measure welcomed by some in view of the current momentum. However, the absence of effective control instruments could pave the way for abuses of power. Remaining vigilant in the face of these potential risks is crucial to ensuring a successful and lasting transition to stability and democracy. Burkina Faso remains under the vigilance of its citizens and, hopefully, of Providence.